Tamiya TRF419 Low profile Towers Part 1
Since the introduction of Tamiya's shorter TRF shocks I have been toying with the idea of making a set of shock towers that will be l...
https://www.thercracer.com/2015/11/tamiya-trf419-low-profile-towers-part-1.html
Since the introduction of Tamiya's shorter TRF shocks I have been toying with the idea of making a set of shock towers that will be lower but still allow me to use proper 25mm touring car springs.
One of the negatives regarding short shocks is the range of springs that are available to use. If you me you have been racing for a long time you find an array of springs that you know work for different surfaces and conditions, so I am loathe to change those. Also there is much less choice when it comes to short springs.
Whist suffering from a dose of man-flu I had enough time to sit around and bring the low profile idea to life. It is quite a simple process. Initially I took measurements from the original TRF419 towers, and then looked at the applied suspension range that Tamiya had decided was ideal for the current car.
To do this I worked out the lower suspension mount point in relation to the front and rear shock towers and worked out the angles that you could mount the shocks.
Original sketch |
Then it was simple, I checked the position of the mount screws to the bulkhead etc and I had my basic drawing for the shock tower.
Next up I translated these into CAD.
The old TRF419 tower on top and the low profile one below |
Low profile on the left, normal on the right. |
Here you can see the front shock tower in front of the original |
The new rear tower on top of the original |
Why Lower Profile?
Put simply the lower the centre of gravity of the car and this will reduce the amount that the car will roll when cornering. This will give you more corner speed and quicker transitions in chicanes etc.Fitting the parts
Yokomo Pinks at the front |
Yokomo Blues at the rear |
Set-up changes
As this car uses the same length springs I kept most things the same such as droop etc. As the car was lower profile I was expecting some changes, especially changing the roll centre shims as the centre of gravity will be slightly different.Track Test
When I got to the track I was eager to get the car out for a run. I decided to run the older tyres that I had used the week before to have a better like for like comparison on lap-times and feel.The first race went ok, although it was quite scrappy for all involved. The first thing I noticed was that the car was much quicker when at the slower part of a corner coming into the apex. It was almost unsettling at first, so I just started to see how the car could take the corner quicker. It felt ok, but not a large leap.
Unfortunately the second race did not give me a lot of time to learn the car. I was mauled by a back marker and that resulted in my GSF shell getting destroyed and I had to retire early.
By third race things were starting to get a bit better, I had got used to the increased response when entering the apex so I started to concentrate on the chicane that we had after the main straight. I had a relatively safe line that I would use to keep my lap times consistent, but I started to explore the extra transition speed by coming into the chicane quicker and flicking the stick left and right. Initially the extra turning speed caught me unaware and I found I was able to come into the chicane much quicker than I was used to. This sounds good but in reality I hit the corner early, just not expecting the amount of grip I was getting and I kept cutting the corner too much. When I did eventually hook it up I went 2 tenths quicker than before just because of the change of line in this one section.
Car all ready and ride height checked |
As the buzzer went we all launched into action. The car felt really good and I was able to quickly catch up to one of the GT10s. The course was very tight and whilst I was following close behind there was very few opportunities to pass. The main thing I was pleased with was how close I was able to stay behind on the corners, the wide foam tyres on the GT10's give a lot of grip and my car was staying close with my used Sorex. As luck would have it the GT10 clipped a corner on the chicane and I saw a gap so gave it more speed than normal to weave through. I managed to hold onto the move despite going wide on the exit. I worked towards catching the second place man, again another GT10, I managed to catch him up and again chased closely behind. I had to maintain this for 15 or so laps, trying to pressure the driver into making a mistake and doing dummy lines, I knew I was faster but I just couldn't find a clean pass. Luckily after all of the laps following close behind, they clipped a corner and went wide so I could just sail past. Next up was the X-Ray in the lead. There was not long left for the race so I had to drive extra hard to try to make up the time I had lost. I managed to claw back a few tenths every lap and as I approached the driver clipped the corner and rolled so I could pass with ease. To be honest I was so pleased with this comeback and my comfortable lead I started to take slightly safer lines to consolidate the victory. Luckily I kept pretty similar speeds and I managed to take victory and also the overall F.T.D.
Hi,
ReplyDeleteNice article. I had a similar idea using the X-ray short shock on my car to lower the cg.
Just being curious. How much did it cost through FibreLyte?
Thanks.
Adrien
I have yet to get the V2 versions made but I would think they will be around £7-10 each (Probably more at the lower scale). I should have the V2 ones sent tomorrow. I might also do some for M-Series shocks as I have had a few of requests for those. (although M-Series shocks cannot use proper springs)
Delete